Tuesday, 22 April 2014

The Co-Op is not coping?

The Co-operative Group has published their worst ever results in their 150-year history. The company announced losses of £2.5bn, with over 80% of this deriving from their problematic banking arm, of which the group recently lost their 70% stake to US hedge funds during the Bank’s rescue. The interim Chief Executive described the year as “disastrous”. Mr Pennycook added “These results should serve as a wake-up call to anyone who doubts just how serious the challenges we face are”. He went on to say, “The scale of this disaster will rightly shock our members, our customers and our colleagues.”
In the last five years the group has been plagued with soaring costs and the next few years don’t look promising for the group either. The company does not expect to make a profit for the next two years. Moreover, Mr Pennycook has cited that he believes it will take at least a decade for the business to completely recover from their worst year ever.
Moving forward, the company has already declared its intention to cut costs by £300m, which could potentially lead to job cuts to their 100,000-employee workforce. The Co-operative Food division has plans to open 100 new small convenience stores this year as a part of their new strategy to focus on small towns and villages. Some argue this new strategy places pressing questions on their earlier £1.57bn acquisition of the Somerfield supermarket chain in March 2009. The addition of large stores to the already extensive Co-op’s estate portfolio, which currently consists of 650 unproductive properties of which 33% are vacant, will put the CEO under further scrutiny. Recently, the UK’s fifth-largest food retailer (6.1% market share) has suffered from falling sales and underlying profits due to the cost of store closures along with price reductions.
Last month, a £400m black hole was discovered putting the bank in a dilemma in regards to whether new shares should be issued to fill this sizable gap. Ultimately, this would mean the Co-op Group would have to raise £120m if it is to retain their 30% shareholding in the Bank. Black holes within the balance sheets seem to be a common occurrence in the Co-op’s Bank. Previous to this, a £1.5bn black hole was discovered in April 2013, shortly after the Bank unsuccessfully attempted to purchase 632 Lloyds Bank branches.
The co-operative movement was set up in Rochdale, in the North of England, where their members consisting of small retailers, wanted to combine their purchasing power. Today, the Co-operative Group remains a “mutual” business, owned by its customers and 8 million members and is the biggest of its kind in the UK. During the last century, the Co-operative Group has diversified into different lines of businesses. It now owns the third-largest chain of Pharmacies, where profits have increased by £5m despite falling sales. The Co-operative Group also own a successful funeral provider, the nation’s biggest, where both sales and profits are increasing.
Critics frequently highlight the complexity of the Co-op’s corporate structure that makes it ungovernable; former Chief Executive, Euan Sutherland, has reiterated this view. Furthermore, Lord Myners stated that the group spent too much time focusing on acquisition deals that proved “breathtakingly value-destructive” and as a result the Co-op has amassed a great deal of unsustainable debt. The future of the Co-operative group is uncertain, however it is more than clear that the company has to make structural changes if it is to continue to exist. However, this revision will prove a substantial task considering the group has almost 300 subsidiaries and a more than complex structure.

By Richmond Amoah

Sunday, 23 February 2014

What’s up with WhatsApp?

This week Facebook bought WhatsApp, the instant messaging mobile application for a staggering $19 Billion dollars (approximately £11.42 Billion). Given the firm was only founded five years ago, this is considered quite a high price and adds to the growing scepticism surrounding the technology industry of over-valued companies, similar to that occurring before the dot-com crash of 2000.

On the otherhand WhatsApp’s valuation can be justified by the fact that it is the world’s fastest growing social network, as 1 million new users join the network’s existing 450 million user base every single day, dwarfing that of Facebook at its peak. In addition it’s at the forefront of smartphone-based messaging mobile apps that is sweeping the world. The others within this small group are mostly regional competitors. These include the Japan’s Line that boasts 340 million users and China’s WeChat with 272 million active users. These start-ups took full advantage of the popularity of data plans that emerged due to the success of smart phones in 2008.

So what exactly is WhatsApp?
It’s an application available on all the major mobile-phone platforms such as Apple and Android, that allows users to send unlimited text, audio, video and picture messages to other users around the world over the internet, without incurring expensive carrier charges. Essentially WhatsApp replaces traditional text messaging and users of the service need no login with the only requirement being a phone number. To date, WhatsApp has never engaged in any advertising campaigns, relying solely on word of mouth for user growth. Currently WhatsApp main income source is subscription fees, which it annually charges to users at £0.69 after a year-long free service. The application’s unique selling point is that it offers the ability to engage in-group conversations and is deemed as a lot more hassle-free than their Facebook or Twitter alternatives. The founder, Yan Koum has avoided the introduction of advertising onto the platform, as he believes it will curb users away. However some users are doubtful whether or not this approach will continue due to Facebook’s increasing reliance on advertising from their core elements. On the other hand, one of the services’ disadvantages is that you need the Internet to use it, unlike text messages that rely entirely on carriers. However this is not too problematic, for users in developed nations, as most people there, live and work within urban areas with strong signals, with most in 3G and 4G enabled areas.

Facebook
Recently, Facebook reportedly attempted to acquire Snapchat, in November of last year for a $3 Billion cash offer, even though the firm continuously made losses. This successful deal on the other and, represents Facebook’s biggest acquisition to date and the highest start up buyout in history. Surprisingly the takeover deal was only initiated 11 days before the announcement and was completed on Valentines Day with the assistance of Morgan Stanley and Allen and Co. Initially the market reacted negatively, as following the deal Facebook shares fell by 5%, before quickly recovering slightly. The £11.4 billion deal was represents approximately 10% of Facebook market capitalization and comprises of £2.4Billion in cash, £7.18 billion in Facebook shares and £1.8 billion in restricted stock to WhatsApp employees, an incentive for them to stay with the firm.  Facebooks founder, Mark Zuckerberg said “I’ve also known Jan for a long time, and I know that we both share the vision of making the world more open and connected.”

Why pay so much?
In acquiring the messaging service, Facebook will get access to WhatsApp young, teenage audience, which it has been losing, according to Pew Research Centre. The paper concluded Teenagers have been maintaining lower profiles on Facebook and instead are spending more of their time on WhatsApp and Snapchat. This buyout may help Facebook regain their original target audience back to their social network of 757 million active daily users
What’s next?
However WhatsApp users will look elsewhere if Facebook ownership means messaging services continue to stop working, which occurred on 22 February for 3 hours, only 3 days after the announcement.  In the meantime, Jan Koum will be joining Facebook’s board after a job rejection from Facebook only a few years ago. "We're excited and honoured to partner with Mark and Facebook as we continue to bring our product to more people around the world." Koum has insisted that WhatsApp will remain in their Mountain View Headquarters in California and will remain independent from Facebook’s existing messaging service.
Only time will tell, whether Facebook’s huge investment in WhatsApp will actually pay off, as WhatsApp’s hostility towards advertising, dramatically reduces the firm’s potential income streams. However one thing for certain, is WhatsApp incredible growth potential, at current projections it will reach the 1 billion user landmark by 2016.

By Richmond Amoah